نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانش آموخته دکتری رشته فقه و حقوق اسلامی، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران ، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Discussion about the nature of religious rule is from imaginary
manners of principles Knowledge . Differences of attitudes
about the nature of religious rule affect basic orientations in
different discussions of principles Knowledge .
There are tow important attitudes about rule definition among
principles scholars . Some believe rule is a falsified and
conventional thing that does not have instance in the real
world and others believe it is a real and incipient thing . Rule
definition according to principles scholars contain one of
introductions and different stage of the rule including interests
and mischiefs , creation , volition , legality and accosting .
In contrast to some scholars who consider religious rule as a
real thing , Imam Khomeini considers rule as a conventional
thing and religious forgery that has just tow degrees of
creation and reality . He has not accepted the definition of the
rule in terms of volition , interests and mischiefs and he
believes these real thing are the introductions of the rule . He
has refused the division of the volition within religious and
incipient volition . He believes the volition of lawgiver about
religious things belongs to the fabrication of the law not to
doing duty by obligated people . In this thesis , different
definitions of the rule and some famous attitudes about the
nature of the creation and convention have been investigated
and the attitude of Imam Khomeini about religious rule has
been compared with other definitions .
Four fold degrees of religious rule have been criticized and
finally , the results of the discussion have been offered .
کلیدواژهها [English]
)